An easy glance at my personal history on this site will attest to the fact i am a huge fan of commitment studies. I am mesmerized because of the techniques we try to implement science to sex and love, assured of a single day having the ability to give an explanation for strange ways of the center.
Some researches offer fascinating insight into modern-day mating rituals, but the majority of (or even many) tend to be, as TruTv.com creator Nick Nadel throws it, “forehead-slappingly clear.” Nadel gathered a list of 10 researches that a lot of seriously end up in aforementioned category. Below are a few on the shows:
Dubious research no. 1: Researchers at Radboud University of Nijmegen into the Netherlands discovered that males tend to have problem executing cognitive activities after socializing with people in the opposite gender. To phrase it differently, Nadel states, “interacting with women tends to make males dumb.”
Nadel’s Take: “As evident scientific studies go, this option is up indeed there with ‘people sometimes fold the facts on the internet.'” It willn’t get an investigation staff to determine that men’s brains get distracted around ladies.
My feelings: I have to side with Nadel about one. It willn’t appear as a shock that men’s room minds get some addled around attractive ladies, and I also bet that a research on ladies’ minds would discover these are typically quite as addled around appealing guys.
Dubious research # 2: based on the conclusions of 1 of OkCupid’s many reports on the OkTrends blog site, people that make use of Twitter daily have smaller interactions compared to those who do perhaps not.
Nadel’s simply take: OkCupid does not even believe their particular findings. a spokesperson when it comes down to website mentioned “unfortuitously, there is no way to tell who is dumping whom here; whether the Twitterati are more annoying or simply just a lot more flighty than everybody else.” Put differently, there isn’t any actual evidence that Twitter has actually almost anything to do aided by the period of a relationship.
My personal Thoughts: If folks in charge of the study are not actually sure exactly what their particular conclusions are, they truly are probably not worth paying a lot focus on. The OkTrends researches are several enjoyable, but are never the definitive phrase on everything internet dating.
Dubious research number 3: the size of men’s ring-finger relates to his attractiveness, in accordance with a team during the University of Geneva in Switzerland. The proportion that compares the size of one’s index hand to their ring finger is called “2D:4D.”
Nadel’s Take: The study claims that guys with extended ring fingers have actually “rugged, caveman-like” confronts. “Right,” Nadel says, “because women always try using the caveman appearance. It isn’t like several of all of our hottest male stars are non-threatening, baby-faced kinds or everything.”
My personal Thoughts: many reports examining female belief of male attractiveness have discovered that women are attracted to several types of men during various levels of these menstrual cycles. A female could, consequently, be interested in both the “baby-faced types” in addition to “rugged cavemen” over the course of monthly. So when far just like the hands get, “relationship just isn’t causation” – though there might be a match up between finger length and attractiveness, one does not fundamentally result in the different.
Keep tuned in for much more frivolous findings and silly scientific studies from Nick Nadel and TruTV…
